Posts Tagged ‘hypocrisy’

Will Gov. Jindal and U.S. Sen. Vitter condemn Newt Gingrich’s offensive remarks at today’s forum with Gingrich?

June 1, 2009

Gov. Bobby Jindal and U.S. Sen. David Vitter are scheduled to attend former House Speaker Newt Gingrich’s New Orleans forum today — less than one week after Gingrich called President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor racist.

Last week, Gingrich wrote on Twitter, “Imagine a judicial nominee said ‘my experience as a white man makes me better than a Latina woman’ new racism is no better than old racism … White man racist nominee would be forced to withdraw. Latina woman racist should also withdraw.”

Gingrich’s remarks have already been repudiated by Republican U.S. Sen. John Cornyn, chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee. Cornyn told NPR, “I think it’s terrible. This is not the kind of tone that any of us want to set when it comes to performing our constitutional responsibilities of advice and consent.”

“Gov. Jindal and David Vitter should condemn Newt Gingrich’s offensive, shameful remarks,” says Chris Whittington, chairman of the Louisiana Democratic Party. “Will they join Senator Cornyn in defending Judge Sotomayor, or will they stay silent in support of Gingrich’s inappropriate and divisive remarks?”

Calls for Gov. Jindal to honor his transparency pledge reach fever pitch

May 11, 2009

As Gov. Bobby Jindal continues his all-out efforts to shield his records from the public, Louisiana media are pointing out Jindal’s hypocrisy. In news stories and editorials from across the state, the calls for Jindal to honor his campaign promise of transparency are reaching fever pitch.

“It’s time for Gov. Jindal to stop stonewalling the public,” says Louisiana Democratic Party Chairman Chris Whittington. “Government transparency is not a partisan issue, and Louisiana citizens deserve to know how their governor is conducting the state’s business.”

Highlights from recent coverage of Jindal’s lack of transparency:

The Times-Picayune – Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal should back transparency for all – including himself

In opposing reform, Gov. Jindal is going against his campaign promise to “upgrade Louisiana’s sunshine laws to improve access to public records and meetings.” … If Gov. Jindal truly wants transparency and accountability for all government officials, including his own office, then he should support the proposals by Rep. Waddell and Sen. Adley — and so should lawmakers.”

Shreveport Times: Governor’s office needs more sunshine

A PAR survey of states found only four governors with considerable discretion in determining what records are open to the public. However, none statutorily grants a public records exception as broad as the one for Louisiana’s governor. …

But what’s up with exempting the governor’s schedule, as SB 278 would? Particularly for a governor who travels so much, both to advance the state and his own political future. Knowing who the governor is meeting with, who is trying to influence him, goes to the heart of government transparency, said one media advocate.

…But it’s hard to hold government accountable when we can’t see what government is doing.”

WWL-TV: Lawmakers pushing to free up governor’s records

Critics like Eyewitness News political analyst Clancy DuBos believe it could actually create new loopholes that would decrease public access. “Well this is a continuation of what Bobby Jindal did a year ago,” DuBos said. “Ethics are for everybody else. For the governor, for himself, he wants exceptions. He wants nobody to know, no exposure, no transparency, no openness. That’s all for the legislature and everybody else.”

The Daily Advertiser: State GOP Chair playing politics

It matters because [Louisiana GOP chairman] Villere has made a mockery of the public records laws – the very foundation of our democracy. Without them, other statutes are meaningless. Even criminal statutes carry little weight if the ultimate check and balance of public oversight of our government, courts and law enforcement entities does not exist.

These laws aren’t partisan.

They never have been. They never should be. As the presumptive leader of state Republicans and a rising star in his party nationally, Jindal should publicly show that he does not condone Villere’s behavior.

The Times-Picayune’s James Gill: For lawmakers, a question of trust in Jindal

[Jindal’s] hypocrisy over “transparency” is merely the tip of the iceberg. He is going around the country raising campaign money as the man who reduced the tax burden in Louisiana while imposing a “gold standard” of ethics on government officials. Legislators know this is pure flim flam.

The Advocate: Open should mean open

Overshadowing much of the debate during the first two weeks of the Louisiana Legislature’s regular session is the question of whether the governor’s office should have to follow the same rules as other elected officials and publicly disclose its records.

Gov. Bobby Jindal, who campaigned on transparency, says no. …

Jindal is invoking, through Faircloth, a deliberative process executive privilege first articulated by former Vice President Dick Cheney. … Cheney’s stance, now Jindal’s stance, suggests an executive who, for whatever reason, has staked a position that cripples the ability of the other branches to check and balance his power.

Gov. Jindal secretly tells Republican legislators: I regret vetoing your pay raise

April 28, 2009

In his speech yesterday to open the 2009 Louisiana legislative session, Gov. Bobby Jindal said he’d made some “past mistakes.” But while Jindal did not elaborate on those mistakes in his speech, he did privately tell his Republican colleagues one of his mistakes: vetoing their pay raises.

From today’s Town-Talk:

Some lawmakers acknowledged that the governor recently told a meeting of the Republican legislative delegation that he regretted vetoing the [pay] raise.

Jindal’s hypocrisy knows no bounds. After flip-flopping on the issue, he told Louisiana citizens he was opposed to the pay raise — but in a closed-door meeting with Republican colleagues, he told them he regrets his veto. Our governor sure has a twisted definition of transparency.

Gov. Bobby Jindal’s new idea in education

March 25, 2009

At a speech last night in Washington, D.C. during his latest out-of-state fundraising junket, Gov. Bobby Jindal offered his thoughts on education.

Speaking to the National Republican Campaign Committee, Jindal said, “The left hasn’t had a new idea on education since the invention of the chalkboard.”

And what is Gov. Jindal’s new idea for Louisiana education? Cutting $219 million from Louisiana’s colleges and universities. While Governors Mike Foster and Kathleen Blanco made higher education a priority for moving Louisiana forward, Gov. Jindal will be the first Louisiana governor in more than a decade to make severe cuts to education. University presidents and faculty across Louisiana have warned that Gov. Jindal’s budget cuts would have a crippling effect on higher education.

“Education isn’t a partisan issue, and Gov. Jindal’s words and actions on this issue are hurting Louisiana,” says Chris Whittington, chairman of the Louisiana Democratic Party.

Jindal’s education cuts are another example of the governor’s hypocrisy. In a speech to the Louisiana Legislature last March, Jindal said, “We must also invest in our institutions of higher education.”

“Louisiana families and students deserve a governor who makes quality education a priority for everyone – and cutting higher education sends a terrible message about Louisiana’s priorities,” says Whittington.

It doesn’t get any clearer than this

March 23, 2009

The New York Times has previously pointed out Gov. Bobby Jindal’s partisan and ill-informed stance on rejecting $98 million in federal unemployment benefits for struggling Louisianians. But as Jindal’s posturing continues and the facts keep piling up that clearly refute his argument, NYT returns to Jindal’s hypocrisy. Highlights:

Republican governors who have been threatening to refuse federal aid rather than sensibly expand state unemployment insurance programs are putting ideology ahead of the needs of their constituents.

The two most prominent grandstanders — Rick Perry of Texas and Bobby Jindal of Louisiana — should listen to lawmakers and taxpayers in their own states who are demanding that they do what’s best for their most vulnerable citizens. …

The claim by some governors that the unemployment aid would lead directly to tax increases has also been discredited. New taxes are triggered automatically when unemployment trust funds fall below specified levels. In many cases, filling their coffers with stimulus aid would actually postpone tax increases. When the stimulus money is spent, states would also be free to revert to the old unemployment insurance laws. …

The time has clearly passed for posturing. With large numbers of people losing their jobs, Mr. Jindal and Mr. Perry need to do what is best for their states and their struggling workers.

Read the whole editorial here.

More uprising over Gov. Jindal’s decision to turn down $98 million in unemployment benefits for Louisiana

March 19, 2009

On the steps of the State Capitol Wednesday, another group of Louisiana citizens voiced their strong opposition to Gov. Bobby Jindal’s decision to turn down $98 million in unemployment benefits for the state. Led by AFL-CIO and United Steelworkers representatives, the gathering showed how real lives are being affected by our struggling economy – and why unemployment benefits are crucial to helping people who need help the most.

Mark Jones, 49, and Hal Mims, 52, attended the news conference. Both were laid off last week by Weyerhaeuser, a Dodson plant in Winn Parish that produced veneer. They said the governor should not reject unemployment benefits when people are losing their jobs.

Full coverage here from The Advocate, as well as video from NBC33-TV here.

 

Behind the Jindal façade

March 16, 2009

Gov. Bobby Jindal’s doublespeak and broken promises aren’t going unnoticed by the media or Louisiana citizens. All that campaign talk about transparency, open government and reform isn’t panning out, and Jindal’s reputation is sinking along with it. It’s getting to the point where nearly every day brings a fresh revelation or analysis of Jindal’s hypocrisy. Veteran Times-Picayune political columnist James Gill, in a column titled “Jindal’s bad year about to get worse,” observes:

For his latest renege there can be no excuse. He is supposed to represent the repudiation of old-time Louisiana politics, but governors never came more mealy-mouthed than this.

When Jindal took office last year, he promised never, ever to endorse candidates in legislative races, such was the purity of his devotion to the sound governance. But that was before Lee Domingue, who had donated $116,000 to Jindal’s campaign and associated causes, decided he wanted to be a state senator from Baton Rouge. It is, to say the least, unusual for a governor to intervene in a local primary, but Jindal up and endorsed Domingue over two other Republicans.

Jindal says the money had nothing to do with it, and his word is enough to leave me in no doubt. It was the money.

Jindal emerged as grubby as your average governor, if not quite so straight talking. That would have been bad enough, but he also came out looking politically clueless.

On the transparency front, Sunshine Week sparked a number of stories and editorials on Jindal’s refusal to open up the governor’s office to public records requests. Gannett’s Mike Hasten notes:

Getting what one would think should be public records from the governor’s office is virtually impossible under state law — a law that earns Louisiana a national survey’s ranking of worst in the nation for access to the governor’s records. …

Pamela Mitchell-Wagner, executive director of the Louisiana Press Association, said newspapers regularly try to get information from the governor’s office but are turned down because “he has that exemption based on it being the governor’s records.”

The Advocate weighs in too:

State Rep. Neal Abramson, D-New Orleans, who filed the donor disclosure bill last year, said Jindal “is sending the wrong message” when he supports legislative transparency but blocks the same standard in his own shop.

[Republican State Rep. Wayne] Waddell and [Republican State Rep. Hunter] Greene also note that transparency has been lacking in the Jindal camp in other areas — including public access to the spending of the $1.4 million raised to help the governor transition into office. In the interest of disclosure, Jindal should also be revealing more timely information on financing of out-of-state political fundraising travel, Waddell said.

“There’s a lot of interest out there” in the governor and the operations of his office, said Waddell.

Today, Jindal only mentions transparency as he talks about goals accomplished and achieving the gold standard. But as Waddell observes, it’s more gold-plated than pure gold — and Jindal’s to blame.

Jindal’s reaction? Ignore it all, and keep scheduling and attending out-of-state campaign fundraisers.

David Vitter’s embarrassing behavior continues

March 11, 2009

Republican U.S. Senator David Vitter threw a temper tantrum in a Washington, D.C. airport, going as far as opening an armed security door and berating a United Airlines employee – because Vitter was late for his flight.

According to Roll Call, Vitter set off a security alarm and “proceeded to dress down an airline employee who told him entering the restricted area was forbidden.” Vitter delivered a “do-you-know-who-I-am tirade” that prompted the airline worker to summon security. Vitter remained defiant and continued yelling, then left the scene when the airline attendant went to get a security guard.

“David Vitter’s behavior continues to embarrass Louisiana,” says Chris Whittington, chairman of the Louisiana Democratic Party. “It’s offensive that David Vitter thinks he deserves special treatment, and thinks it’s perfectly OK to berate an employee that was only doing their job.”

Whittington says Vitter continues to be a black eye for Louisiana. “Vitter’s prostitution scandal, his partisan obstruction to President Obama’s economic recovery plan, and his lack of respect for airport security shows Vitter’s same lack of respect for the people of Louisiana.”

Roll Call‘s headline: Vitter goes from Hookergate to Gate-Crashing.

Gov. Bobby Jindal’s stock dropping fast

March 10, 2009

Gov. Bobby Jindal’s stock as a rising national figure in the Republican Party plummeted after his empty speech opposing President Barack Obama’s economic recovery plan – and Jindal keeps sinking at home, too. With the April legislative session looming, Jindal’s continued political posturing isn’t making Louisiana lawmakers or constituents very happy. The Associated Press reports:

Democratic lawmakers bristled at Jindal’s criticisms of the $787 billion stimulus plans crafted by President Barack Obama and the Democratic-controlled Congress, and they’ve accused the governor of playing national politics to the detriment of Louisiana.

The burgeoning partisan split in a Capitol that often tries to steer clear of such spats threatens to blow up on Jindal in a regular legislative session that already was going to be contentious because of hefty budget cuts and lingering irritation from previous Jindal vetoes. …

But Jindal’s tough talk against the stimulus nationally isn’t really panning out locally.

In his nationally-televised response to Obama’s address to Congress, Jindal called the stimulus irresponsible and said there should be less government intervention in the country’s economic woes.

However, with the national Republican speech over and Louisiana’s budget problems looming, Jindal is acknowledging he intends to tap into large amounts of stimulus money, most of it to help balance the state’s budget over the next two years.

And criticism of Jindal’s non-stop politicking and out-of-state fundraising is coming from all sides, as Gambit Weekly reports:

Jindal still has the support of national talk-radio poobah Rush Limbaugh, who has talked him up as future presidential material, but on statewide conservative radio, it’s a different story. Monroe-based conservative talk-radio host Moon Griffon (nicknamed the “Louisiana Limbaugh”), whose weekday program is immensely popular in north and west Louisiana, has been slamming Jindal for months, dubbing him “Campaign Bobby.” …But criticism is also coming from state GOP sources like radio host Jeff Crouere, former executive director of the Louisiana Republican Party, who said, “I think Gov. Jindal should refund to the state pro-rata money for all those days he is out of state on personal business.”

Most tellingly, Republicans in Baton Rouge’s Senate District 16 sent a strong message against Jindal in last Saturday’s election. Some background first, from The Advocate:

Usually Republican officials stay out of races that involve more than one GOP candidate.

But Jindal chose to endorse one of three Republicans in the state Senate District 16 race. He picked Lee Domingue, who had contributed $118,500 to the governor’s interests since 2006. Domingue’s Republican opponents Laurinda Calongne and Dan Claitor did not give money to Jindal. …

Jindal said Domingue’s donation had nothing to do with his selection. Just as, he said, the $232,350 donated by the Chouest family and their businesses to the governor’s campaigns since 2006 had no influence on his government’s decision to give economic development grants and tax credits to a project owned by the family.

Compounding matters is the involvement of perennial Jindal cheerleader Rolfe McCollister, Jindal’s campaign treasurer and publisher of Baton Rouge Business Report. McCollister’s the founder of Believe in Louisiana, the tax-exempt organization solely devoted to raising money for and promoting Jindal’s agenda. Lee Domingue gave a $100,000 donation to Believe in Louisiana, and – surprise! – McCollister endorsed Domingue.

It’s so transparent that voters knew the score, and Claitor edged Domingue with 42 percent of the vote, setting up a runoff on April 4.

So, will Gov. Jindal be stumping for Domingue for the next three weeks?

Vitter’s hypocrisy on the omnibus bill and Louisiana projects

March 9, 2009

Republican U.S. Senator David Vitter continues to show blind allegiance to the national Republican Party’s obstructionist agenda, as Vitter has told The Times-Picayune that he plans to vote against the omnibus bill. But Vitter, who tries to paint himself as a fiscal conservative, has more than 140 earmarks – totaling nearly $250 million — in the omnibus bill that he’s personally sponsored or co-sponsored with Democratic U.S. Senator Mary Landrieu and other legislators.

 

These earmarks include funds for Pennington Biomedical Research Center ($623,000), a drug task force for the Louisiana Sheriffs Association ($700,000), a new terminal for Monroe Regional Airport ($1.4 million), multiple Louisiana road and infrastructure projects, and funding for universities across the state.

 

So why does Vitter plan to vote against the omnibus bill?

 

“This is another glaring example of David Vitter’s hypocrisy,” says Chris Whittington, chairman of the Louisiana Democratic Party. “The omnibus plan contains numerous projects that benefit Louisiana and will help move the state forward, but all David Vitter cares about is playing partisan politics.”

 

Whittington says Vitter’s real motives will be on display after Vitter’s vote.

 

“Watch him try and take credit for Louisiana projects and funding that he voted against,” says Whittington. “David Vitter has a difficult time giving straight answers to the people of Louisiana.”

 

You know Vitter’s grasping at straws when even conservative commentator Laura Ingraham calls him out.